Nikolai Dvigubsky’s set for Mirror, says Tarkovsky (as related in a recent book) ‘was an apartment in which time itself lived’. Time itself: but how was the director to show time, to let his audience feel its pressure? The secret was the shot, and preparing for the shot – for particular conditions of light, of weather. The shot, and a minimal number of takes for the shot. A single take was ideal, rehearsed but one-off: Tarkovsky wanted to allow time to flow, living and aleatory – wanted to capture and release what he called ‘the ceaseless flow of living life that surrounds us’. To capture it and release it, both at once: the shot must breathe, live. And it must let time live …
In the end, I’m not sure what this means. I must think about it my own way. Morning, the acid-cleaned yard, dry and bright like the surface of the moon. The rearranged plants. The new table at which I write, at right angles to the window, no longer looking directly out. Pink painted wallpaper instead. A quilt made for hanging instead; a pot for pens. A CD – The Drift. My appointments diary, and then the book on Tarkovsky from which I quoted. This, all this and the light that falls indifferently upon everything, shady in this room, bright outside. The light, indifferent and calm …
How to let time live? How to give life to the shot (the imaginary shot that pans around my flat …)? I would like to lift the occasional to the eternal, write that. That’s what I’d like, without knowing what it means: to lift the morning into the eternal and let it be bathed in its light. The eternal: and in writing as clear and luminous as the moon’s surface. Writing that receives its light from the hidden source of the day, from the sun above the hazy cloud. That burns with that light, with its indifference, its distance.
And now I imagine that that’s not the way time might be found, but something else. A kind of undoing, an uncoupling of moment from moment. The wearing away of time, of linearity, of succession. Sometimes I imagine there is a kind of passion of daylight. That, seen from a certain angle, light will fall into itself and the day turns inwards and away, discovering another dimension. That just as the third dimension might unfold from a second – a line becomes a cube, and with the fourth, is set in motion, there is a fifth and a sixth … an infinite succession. The day unfolds itself in itself, it blooms there. Only this is the opposite of a bloom, its movement is different. The day is discovering itself. The day explores itself in itself; the sun not only shines outward, but inward, light pressing into light.
Where is time alive? Right now? In this room? Or outside, over the acid-cleaned yard? In the sky, or in the sun above the sky? I would like the gates of writing to enclose and free this other time. For writing to lose the eternal and to keep it. Tell a story in order to admit what cannot be told. A narrative that speaks of what fails to happen and withdraws. That loses an event in the Event, time in the fraying of time.
I am in Manchester again, write that. It’s the middle of the 90s, write that. There’s the meadows and the river that runs down to Didsbury, write that. Who was I talking to? What were we talking about, wandering along the path? I don’t think we had plans. We were too old for them, and too young. Too old – we thought nothing unexpected would happen. The same would remain the same. One day would pass, another, and here we were, in the middle of life, already lost. And too young – because we had no come up against the world; the city hadn’t been regenerated, the unemployed hadn’t been called in for training. Benefits rained munificently upon us. We were unemployed, ill, and lived on the benefits that fell everywhere like soft rain.
No plans, nothing to talk about. In truth, we’d worn away every topic. There was nothing of which to speak, nothing in particular, and therefore everything. Speech, voided was filled with light. Our long days – it was always summer – seemed to live not only in our words, but in the silences between them, in the inanity of our humour. We joked, we wore jokes away. We spoke and wore down speech: what was there left to say. But, as we reached it, it was this void we seemed to have in common. Or that seemed to me, at least, what we shared, what was held between us, and that made us the terms of a relationship that seem to precede us and would outlast us. As though it looked only for speakers who had worn away speech. As though it waited there at the edge of speech, for speech to lost its referent, and wander, like the day, into itself.
A wandering speech. A speech lost from what there is to speak about. A speech that has left behind topics and issues. Who were you, and who was I? No one in particular. Neither of us was anyone in particular. It was summer, eternal summer, and the sun blazed above the clouds, lost in itself. The day drew itself up to its fiery point. And speech was drawn into itself between us. And speech drew us, I imagined, to the fiery point at its centre. A point that was, in truth, only an involution, a crossing point to another dimension. Speech had its passion there, between us. Speech looked to attain itself there.
Once I went out with a girl into the uncertainty of the meadows. Was it my birthday or hers? Were we carrying a picnic? We sat in the grass – was that it? We spoke – but what did we speak about? I think a lunchtime passed like that. I watched her stretch in the sun. She seemed sleepy. She doesn’t belong here, I thought, and not with me. Not here, in the indeterminable, I thought. She needed someone who wasn’t lost in time, for whom light was vanishing into itself. Needed a crosser of days, a worker, who could bind time to tasks and live life forward. For I wasn’t living my life, not quite. I wasn’t up to it – to time, it was stranded in me. Time had stranded itself, lain down. We were not to have a relationship – how could we? Nothing was to happen between us – how could it? Like the weapons of the terrorist organisation in negotiations, I’d been placed out of use. Out of use, a tool for no purpose, lost in the long grass of the meadows.
I saw her again, I remember that. Saw her: but there was a veil between us, or I saw her from the other side of a window. Time didn’t seem to gather itself up between us. There wasn’t a threshold there, as I imagined there was for a time that afternoon in the grass. Nothing was to begin – of course. Nothing could begin – that was natural, it was the order of things. It was on the street, she was wearing her glasses for driving; she was smartly dressed. She was on the way somewhere; she had an errand. An errand, I thought, imagine that. And to be on your way – where? Back home? Out for dinner? To meet someone? She had time on her side. Time had been martialled. And I was still lost in the marshes where minute was barely joined to minute.
Men are supposed to suffer their feeling of ineligibility with particular acuteness. No money, no prospects. No car, or the chance of a car. Who among us, back then, could drive? Who had any thought of driving? It was summer, the mid 90s; an eternal noon. There were the meadows to walk through and a river path to follow. We were to speak and wear down speech. We were to let time neglect itself, to stand still in hidden pools. Time unmoving in the shade, and the sky mounting higher and higher. It was noon, eternal noon. Dragonflies were blue threads (what poem is that from?) Did we suffer? In some vital way, we slept. In some way, we were asleep in the misty rain of our benefits.
Morning, the acid-cleaned yard. I listen to James Blackshaw. An estate agent is coming to measure up the rooms. We did a patch up job on the fireplace surrounds. The Drift arrived – I wanted the original, and here it is, in its box. A tub of pens; vaseline for my lips. A pen and a pencil. The cordless mouse. Above this, all of this, the sun falls into itself. I would like writing to fall, I tell myself. For the words on the screen to buckle and cave in. And yet for those words to remain those words. How to let writing turn a corner? How to let writing surprise itself like an unexpected vista?
The secret’s back there, I think, back in Manchester. The secret’s buried in the mid 1990s when the hallway of the noon arched above me. A shot is falling through the air. Who’s watching? A shot – who’s shooting, what director? The sun directs; the sun is making a film. And the sun writes, is that it? And the sun returns to itself in writing – is that it?
(I used to dream in my foolishness of a book called The Judgement. A book that would fall like an axe from the sky and cut my head from my body. To be judged, to kneel, to be executed. I wrote some pages, I remember that. A sheaf – a whole sheaf of pages, printed out and held together with treasury tags. A manuscript – how laughable! A book in place of a book, of The Judgement. I thought to substitute an ending for what could not end, and to bind the beginningless to a beginning. I thought I could substitute its indifference for words and sentences and printed pages.
Laughter. But you’d stopped writing by the time you found the meadows, hadn’t you? You were done with writing, you’d worn your ambitions away, hadn’t you? Pages, pages, but what difference did they make? There were always too many or too few. Too many – because you’d interrupted writing to write them. And too few – because you could never catch up with what moved through your pages. Laughter. – You threw away your manuscript. – I did, of course I did. – There was never a manuscript. – There never was, not really. A book in place of a book. Writing in place of writing.
Laughter. – You’d tried to approach the noon too directly. Tried to write directly of the sun, of light, of the judgement. – Yes, that’s true. – You’d didn’t know to approach it by indirection, that it could only open unexpectedly like a vista. – And close up again. – And close itself up again.)